On 12.04.2016 20:18, Dave Cridland wrote: > There is, however, "olm", from the Matrix folk. This is a direct copy of > Axolotl, except done as a decent spec and with (I think) a > liberally-licensed reference implementation. Should be fully compatible > with Signal's. > > If we can (nominally) switch to Olm, I'm actually quite happy with this > spec (given the current absence of any proxy re-encryption stuff).
Sounds very reasonable and indeed, at least on first sight, the spec does look pretty clear. It would be interesting to actually test the compatibility with the Signal protocol, though, and to hear some feedback from people who have implemented OMEMO so far... Best regards, Fabian _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
