On 05.07.2016 11:10, Kevin Smith wrote: > On 5 Jul 2016, at 09:51, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote: >> XEP development behind closed doors is not desirable. > > To be fair, that isn’t what’s happening here,
It was not my intention to suggest that this was the case in MIX. It was more meant as generic statement. But I think it became obvious that there are many parties interested in MIX development, which are unable to follow the development process and, as consequence, are unable to contribute to it. > it’s just that Steve wants to double-check that the text reflects > the Summit agreements before he submits. Ensuring that the text reflects whatever was agreed on the summit sounds more like a reason to make the text public as soon as possible, instead of a reason to hold it back. Ideally we have - the latest development version of MIX available (rendered and raw) - a page which tons of information (rationale, design ideas, discarded approaches, ...) about MIX - a meeting to discuss MIX development once in a while (e.g., every month) But that's my wishful thinking. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
