Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:36:39 +0100 Kim Alvefur <z...@zash.se> wrote: > If we think of blocking strangers by default as a privacy protection > measure
Not everyone wants such rude default privacy. > Second, MUC can be made to work if the server allows traffic from > JIDs to which directed presence has been sent. And what about IQ? What if one wants to use http-upload service? Probably there is a use case for messages too. So, basically, we should accept all incoming traffic from an entity if outgoing traffic has been sent to that entity? > Third, subscription requests should probably not be blocked by > default. It may be sensible UX to present blocking as an optional > response. Subscription spam problem is still unresolved in this case. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
