Hi Daniel, a lot of what Dave said about future proofing spoke to me and I'm > starting to think he (and the others) are right. >
Thanks for trying to see it from another perspective. My motivation in this discussion has indeed always been future-proofing. > It would become an > Informational XEP (or maybe historical). Given the multiple implementations of siacs, a historical XEP sounds like a good idea to me regardless of the outcome of your current proposal. And it might indeed take the heat of discussions. > rolling the dice again and again until the key matches some > criteria doesn't sound like something that should be in a standard. > I agree. > Client authors who are looking for a short term solution (and can live > with the downsides) can implement OMEMO while all the protocol work > would go into OMEMO-NEXT. > That sounds reasonable to me. Remko
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
