Tue, 12 Sep 2017 13:10:54 +0200
Guus der Kinderen <guus.der.kinde...@gmail.com> wrote:

> By not tying this XEP to Blocking, the XEP becomes even easier to
> implement, but also more versatile. As a slightly embarrassing, but
> truthful, illustration: if this XEP would not have been dependent on
> Blocking, it would now already be in Openfire (I tried, but failed,
> as the privacy list implementation in Openfire is too complex to
> easily integrate this).

That's what I'm trying to say here. This is clearly a problem of
software dependencies. Reducing them resolves the problem.
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to