Am Mo., 1. Apr. 2019 um 09:26 Uhr schrieb Evgeny <xramt...@gmail.com>: > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:13 AM, Paul Schaub <vanitasvi...@fsfe.org> > wrote: > > There was a ton of > > interesting discussions around OMEMO and other stuff, as well as some > > productive coding (and Mate!). > > Not to bash the ProtoXEP itself, but why the community constantly > discussing OMEMO (and sometimes PGP), when there is ongoing work on MLS > which will most likely be the standard e2e encryption? You also didn't > mention MLS in your ProtoXEP at all.
Aside from all the justified criticism of OMEMO it is currently the best option for the casual user who uses a public server. 27 is still a mess to set up; OTR is complete garbage and MLS is simply not available right now. Also we have successfully pushed OMEMO into a fairly high number of clients; it would be unfair to users and developers alike to just drop it. That doesn’t mean we can’t simultaneously explore other options. cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
