On Sun, Jun 30, 2019, at 15:16, Ralph Meijer wrote: > Hmm. On which port? I want to point out explicitly that although 5223 > has been used a bunch since before the IETF standardization, IANA has > assigned it to some HP management service. Hence my other proposal, > which is still currently unregistered.
5222, assuming a client connection, probably. If we ever got a port registered for xmpps-client, I'd probably switch it to that. Although right now it seems fine to do both on 5222. —Sam _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
