4 Mar 2020 4:36:08 pm Kevin Smith :
> On 26 Feb 2020, at 17:24, Jonas Schäfer < jo...@wielicki.name > [mailto:jo...@wielicki.name] > wrote: > > > > > On Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2020 16:40:06 CET Ivan Vučica wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Sometimes, protocols backing transports may support querying for an > > > archive similar to how it's done with XEP-0313. > > > > > > tl;dr Can querying archives on non-own, non-MUC, non-pubsub JID for > > > 1:1 chats be standardized? Can it be standardized that server > > > implementations don't have to support date-based queries? > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. XEP-0313 is specified for archives maintained by the user's own > > > server. Section 3.3 doesn't specify that a client can query a remote > > > JID for the archive, which would be useful for transports. It does > > > specify it for MUC and pubsub, but not for 1:1. > > > > > > Here I'm mainly interested: Are there clients that would query a > > > remote JID for the archive today, despite XEP-0313 not requiring > > > servers nor clients to support this? Under which conditions would they > > > do this? > > > > > > > Ugh. No, I don’t think any client would query a remote JID for 1:1 archives. > > > > Why not? MAM’s just a mechanism for querying archives for messages, surely it > shouldn’t matter where the archive is? I meant "right now as it stands". -- Jonas Schäfer This was sent from mobile, and I'm not good with those. Sorry for brevity and such. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
