On Dienstag, 2. Juni 2020 17:36:32 CEST Sam Whited wrote: > > Then it has a non-obvious disadvantage (apparently) even to technical > > users, in that it inserts invisible unicode codepoints. This will > > cause hard-to- troubleshoot issues when (parts of) the message are > > copied into a thing which cares about it, such as a C compiler. > > I don't think this is a problem we should worry about. If this is a > problem for you, you already have this problem all over the web and > everywhere else and the answer is not "pretend Unicode doesn't exist and > don't use it".
I have yet to see a widely used thing in the web which injects hidden Unicode codepoints in user-submitted content. Note that I’m not complaining about the use of Unicode. I’m complaining about the non-obvious injection of invisible codepoints in user content messages. kind regards, Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
