On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:25, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote:
> Just to focus on a tiny bit of this... > > On 8 Dec 2020, at 08:40, Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > "this wasn't really a message at all, this message explains why". The > latter feels like a case of failed feature negotiation, though. > > > I think we used to believe that. In the face of carbons and MAM, I it’s no > longer true (and maybe it never was). > It's still a failure even if there's no good way to do it for now. Either way, I think we do need a better story around this failure case, and a way of reducing the failure case. Dave.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
