Andrzej, As you guess, 407 was done before 424.
I think it makes sense to update 407 to use and reference 424 Regards Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Standards <standards-boun...@xmpp.org> On Behalf Of Andrzej > Wojcik > Sent: 19 March 2021 15:59 > To: XMPP Standards <standards@xmpp.org> > Subject: [Standards] [XEP-0407] - Message retraction question > > Hi, > > While I was rereading XEP-0407 I discovered that it specifies custom > <retract/> element within urn:xmpp:mix:misc:0 namespace. I'm now > wondering why it uses this custom solution instead of using <retract/> > element with namespace urn:xmpp:message-retract:0 as specified in XEP- > 0424. > > I suppose that XEP-0407 was created before XEP-0424, so there was no other > way to specify retraction. Now, as we have XEP-0424 I wonder if XEP-0407 > should (or could) be updated to follow what XEP-0424 does for message > retraction to have a single way to retract a message? > > Regards, > Andrzej Wójcik > > XMPP: andrzej.woj...@tigase.org > Email: andrzej.woj...@tigase.net > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
