> The problem is that I need to have presence subscription to do that on a bare > JID (due to "https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0030.html#security";), even if > the node I want to request (in the presence case, it's XEP-0277's microblog > node) is open and thus publicly accessible.
> I've made a pull request to update XEP-0030 at > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1145[1] . My proposal is to remove entirely > those considerations (but to keep ones regarding available resources). Thanks for providing the PR. I see the rationale and the need for a change, and I don't disagree with a backward-compatible change. However, in the specific PR you are completely removing the "algorithmic" description of what a server is supposed to do and which exact replies it has to send. Instead, I would very much welcome a PR that retains the overall structure that you removed, and instead improves the wording of the conditions to cover the additional use cases, like nodes with "open" access model. > An other option could be to keep the consideration, but allow disco#info when > a node is specified, thus one could disco#info with node > "urn:xmpp:microblog:0" even without pubsub subscription, that would keep the > "service-unavailble" when no node is specified (but I think this measure will > become totally useless as open nodes will become more common). If you prefer to go down this path, this would be a change to XEP-0277, where it can just override the default "MUST NOT" behavior of 0030 without touching the text of 0030, but I really see a need to update 0030 to cover the "open" nodes. Georg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
