To that, I might also add:
1. Nuicanse presence subscriptions can be blocked/reported using existing XEPs 2. In our most secure implementations, we also include additional legal identity and public cryptographic keys in presence subscriptions, allowing for E2EE as a mechanism to avoid spam also. Best regards, Peter Från: Peter Waher<mailto:peterwa...@hotmail.com> Skickat: den 7 mars 2023 11:44 Till: standards@xmpp.org<mailto:standards@xmpp.org> Ämne: RE: Proposal against spam Hello We use the following simple rules in our clients to avoid spam: 1. Normal and Chat Messages received from JIDS without an approved presence subscription are automatically rejected, unless there’s a valid exception registered in the client. (I.e. a white-list instead of a black-list is employed). 2. Group Chat Messages from Groups not actively joined are also automatically rejected. While (1) is somewhat more restrictive than what the RFCs permit, it works for all our use cases. In the cases we need unsolicited messages from sources not in our roster, or without active presence subscriptions, we register explicit validation handlers. These can algorithmically approve a message to be delivered through the client. Such a solution (internal filters) avoid routing messages through external filters (that would become vulnerable from a privacy and security point of view). Best regards, Peter
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________