On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 13:45, Goffi <go...@goffi.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you Matthew for raising that. Regarding that XEP-0060 is stable, I don't > think that a new argument is a good idea. I'm more in favor of any of the > other options.
Yep, that makes sense, I suspect most people will be of this opinion. > If a client may ask for an override, it may be necessary to add a config > option > to forbid this behaviour. A node owner may have specified a value for a > reason, and it would probably be bad UX to make it change transparently > because some client thinks that it is better (I realise that this is what is > currently happening with the 2 rounds trip, I'm just thinking out loud). In this scenario the client *is* the node owner. I'm not sure how we can sensibly prevent someone from configuring a node they have permission to configure. Regards, Matthew _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- standards@xmpp.org Info: Unsubscribe: %(real_name)s-unsubscribe@%(host_name)s _______________________________________________
