Would it be relevant to also include PubSub nodes?
As stated in the introduction, I would ideally like this specification to stay narrow-scoped and short, so I would rather let it stay focused on a "collection of room", using existing mechanisms as much as possible.
That said, adding another type of entities in the list returned by disco#items on a space sounds very possible, maybe with a namespaced "spaces:type" attribute for the <items>, or by running addressing disco#items directed at different node, eg, "space#pubsub-nodes". Why not, but again, I would like to avoid falling into the perfect, extensive solution that no one will implement.
Having an editable collection of rooms would already be a nice addition for our MUC services IMHO.
-- nicoco _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
