Nicolas, I thank you very much for your respond. ~ Schimon
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:40:03 +0100 Nicolas Cedilnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Would it be relevant to also include PubSub nodes? > > As stated in the introduction, I would ideally like this > specification to stay narrow-scoped and short, so I would rather let > it stay focused on a "collection of room", using existing mechanisms > as much as possible. > > That said, adding another type of entities in the list returned by > disco#items on a space sounds very possible, maybe with a namespaced > "spaces:type" attribute for the <items>, or by running addressing > disco#items directed at different node, eg, "space#pubsub-nodes". Why > not, but again, I would like to avoid falling into the perfect, > extensive solution that no one will implement. > > Having an editable collection of rooms would already be a nice > addition for our MUC services IMHO. > > -- nicoco > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
