Le 17/08/2023 à 18:42, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 7:47 AM Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote:
This paper, at first glance, looks really, really good, measuring
detailed topology of the starlink network:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863
Thank you J Pan for passing it along!
More recent data here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/StarlinkEngineering/comments/15p76j4/impressive_improvement_in_three_months_no_longer/
Sorry but I do not understand the graphs. The URL sounds great.
For my part, I can tell that I follow one particular sat chosen
arbitrarily (STARLINK-6064) on a public database since some weeks now
and it keeps at around 360km altitude. That is much lower than
500-or-so usual. Maybe it is that lower altitude that permits a higher
performance (lower latencies).
(there are other sats even lower, but not sure whether they're there in
error or on their way up).
Alex
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: J Pan <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM
Subject: starlink
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Hi Dave: thanks for your libreqos work. did you see
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863 ? cheers. -j
--
J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), [email protected], Web.UVic.CA/~pan
--
Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxmoBr4cBKg
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
