On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
For my part, I can tell that I follow one particular sat chosen
arbitrarily (STARLINK-6064) on a public database since some weeks now
and it keeps at around 360km altitude. That is much lower than
500-or-so usual. Maybe it is that lower altitude that permits a higher
performance (lower latencies).
Interesting, their phase 2 satellites will be in 335-245Km orbits, but the
databases I've looked at don't show any of them being launched yet
(there are other sats even lower, but not sure whether they're there in
error or on their way up).
I've seen some lists showing sats at 70km, which is well below the definition of
'in space', so some of those numbers are just plain wrong.
David Lang
Alex
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: J Pan <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM
Subject: starlink
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Hi Dave: thanks for your libreqos work. did you see
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863 ? cheers. -j
--
J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), [email protected],
Web.UVic.CA/~pan
--
Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxmoBr4cBKg
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
