Oh Jeff You do amaze me, for all the self-professed intellectual grandiosity that you supposedly harbour, that you should spend even a fraction of time bothering to send replies to such "idiotic emails" is in itself astonishing. Should I be grateful to humbled by such objective wisdom?
I personally don't give a good damn for the lame and over-pedantic protocols that are dictated by those who think they are in essence some abject authority, and deign to chastise us 'weaker mortals' for minor indiscretions of even calculably less significance. So what if someone types ram instead of RAM, is it really that big a deal? It staggers me that you contrive to accuse with such venom as to the crime of "characterisation", and then proceed to attempt some kind of verbal assisination of someone you've never actually met! You really do suffer from delusions of superiority oh presumptious one. Just one question begs if you really can see me from a thousand miles. how come you keep on bumping into me? I must admit I can't say the same about you, but then I'm kind of glad about that. on 28/7/03 16:53, J.S. Garrison at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > on 7/27/03 9:43 PM, peartree at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Dear Jeff, >> >> you know not what you talk of or for why, you are simply defending without >> reason And not even yourself at that!! I made a point to Daniel, about >> complaining over points of insignificance under the grander scheme of things >> as it were! Your involvement of course is truly startling >> >> You were almost right about the freedom part, But I'll leave that for you to >> ponder perhaps you discuss it with list mommy > > > You'd be amazed at what I know, little mind. And as far as "The Grander > Scheme Of Things", if you'd find YOUR part in it, you'll have FAR less time > to send idiotic emails to people you don't even know, but take joy in > characterizing. > > What you said to Dan was, in essence, he's talking grammatical dichotomy > when he SHOULD be concentrating on ending world hunger and oppressive > political regimes. > > I'm NOT the only person who recognized the purile absurdity of that. > Website owners don't generate sacks full of loot to go forth > and cure the world's ills, as, say a rock star of Bono's income does. > > And, if there are misogynies to be repaired, it comes from the likes of > misanthropes like yourself, who probably haven't spent even a single > day in a soup kitchen on the serving end. Or delivering food to the elderly. > Maybe the Peace Corps? Or caring for the children of AIDS patients. > > Some of us HAVE done those things, little mind. And can see you coming from > a thousand miles away........ > > > Jeff > -- StarMax is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... / Buy books, CDs, videos, and more from Amazon.com \ / <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/lowendmac> \ Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> StarMax list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/starmax.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/starmax%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
