On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 03:40 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Hi.
> I became new maintainer for s-c-netboot and I 
> have found this interesting mailing list. It
> seems we are doing same thing but in different
> way. S-c-netboot is quite old now and needs 
> some serious work and the question is develop
> it alone or use some parts of your work. And 
> seems same for Stateless Fedora project. The 
> best way I think is to use what is already done,
> work together, s-c-netboot can act as (G)UI for 
> Stateless Fedora/RHEL project.
> With beginning of system configuration management
> project (PolicyKit etc.) we can have independent 
> backend for users to access stateless configuration
> etc.
> I've already read old thread "s-c-netboot vs..."
> but it's quite old now...
> So what do you think? ;-)   

I'm currently starting to tackle this on two (2) fronts for RHEL:  

1.  Run Local (X+GNOME):  PXE Stateless
2.  Run Remote (X-only):  LiveCD Tools (not for CDs, but EEPROM)

I'm not against a hybrid mode either, where some things run local.  But
right now I'm trying to find a balance, and possibly a competition,
performance-wise.

First off, it's clear there are initrd and init-script changes required
for RHEL in both solutions.  E.g.,

Just getting /tmp to come up as tmpfs seems to be a chicken-egg order
issue in PXE Stateless (using s-c-netboot, plus other mods).

When it comes to the LiveCD Tools, there are things Anaconda doesn't do
in RHEL 5 that newer Fedora releases do.  I don't think attempting to
bring in newer, select Anaconda packages (which a CentOS/Scientific
Linux effort is doing for 5) is the right move.  I'd rather put it in a
%post or post-install modification from the stock/errata packages of
RHEL 5, to minimize engineering support requirements.

I just got time at my client to start tackling these details head-on.
This is in addition to merging in select LTSP capabilities (LDM, LTSPfs
which requires FUSE) into RHEL 5, which I'm also tackling.  And I won't
even go into the POS device details (that is another issue, one I am
tackling via another option for remote, they work fine locally in Linux,
which is what I spent some time playing with prior here at the client).

-- Bryan J Smith
   GPS at a major Retail (Point-of-Sale) customer

BCC:  Select individuals (not sure if they are on the stateless-list).


-- 
Bryan J Smith - Senior Consultant - Red Hat GPS SE US
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]      +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) 
----------------------------------------------------- 
For every dollar you spend  on Red Hat solutions, you
not only fund  the leading community  development re-
source, but you receive the  #1 IT industry leader in
corporate value.  http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ 


_______________________________________________
Stateless-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/stateless-list

Reply via email to