On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 08:51 +0530, "Sankarshan (সঙ্কর্ষণ)" wrote:
> From a rudimentary discussion about livecd-tools in EPEL vis-a-vis that
> in Fedora, I get to comprehend that a far larger number of underlying
> blocks have changed than can be handled by backports.

That seems to be the case, especially with Anaconda and related tools,
etc...

My efforts, and I'm speaking from 98% ignorance here, will probably be
aimed at -- sadly enough -- an "one-off" package for RHEL 5 only.  I
don't know how much "reuse" will be a reality for RHEL 6, since RHEL 6
will likely have what the Fedora 9/10 packages today.

I'm document all I can and try to compare to what Fedora 9/10 have in
its livecd-tools, but that's the feeling I'm getting more and more.


-- 
Bryan J Smith - Senior Consultant - Red Hat GPS SE US
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]      +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) 
----------------------------------------------------- 
For every dollar you spend  on Red Hat solutions, you
not only fund  the leading community  development re-
source, but you receive the  #1 IT industry leader in
corporate value.  http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ 


_______________________________________________
Stateless-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/stateless-list

Reply via email to