Craig Andrews wrote:
So maybe just let XEP-80 data update the profile table instead? I can
don't see much value in having two different locations for the same user.
But I don't think storing the XMPP location in the Profile is an ideal
solution. [...]
If we have a table of full jid (include the resource part) and location,
then we can avoid these issues.
Those seem like edge cases. The downside of having multiple locations
stored is that they can easily get out of sync, and that user
expectations are violated.
If you'd like to support XEP-80, I'd really appreciate it if you'd
update the profile table rather than making a new table.
-Evan
--
Evan Prodromou
CEO, StatusNet, Inc.
[email protected] - http://identi.ca/evan - +1-514-554-3826
_______________________________________________
StatusNet-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
