Ok, I think I understand better now. So you're saying that this is something that you'd rather not have in GSoC at all, then? If so, that's ok and I fully understand. If you would rather I submit another proposal for another project, I would be happy to do that. I will look back over the list of project ideas later this evening and see what else looks interesting to me. Thanks for your help.
-John On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Evan Prodromou <[email protected]> wrote: > John Albright wrote: > >> I understand your concerns about this feature, especially when it comes to >> security. I know that a feature like this has to be done carefully. I would >> appreciate it if you could give me some more feedback. >> > OK, I'll be happy to do that. However, we have this feature on our 1.0 > roadmap for StatusNet, with a target release date in June. I realize the > feature was up on our GSoC site, so it's perfectly reasonable for you to > make your application for it. That was an error on our part; we should have > been more careful screening the list of projects. > > Also, I'm interested to hear your thoughts on the security concerns you >> have. Maybe there is more to this than what I initially thought. Would it be >> possible to maybe break the feature into smaller parts, and I work on one >> part of it for GSoC? >> > Is there really not another project on that list that you're interested in? > > > -Evan > > -- > Evan Prodromou > CEO, StatusNet, Inc. > [email protected] - http://evan.status.net/ - +1-438-380-4801 > >
_______________________________________________ StatusNet-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
