I also like option (3) best, so sounds like the home for
the new regression tests is unanimously in tests/regress/
The remaining question is the file name convention. Do we
go with <section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp or do
we allow things like:
<section-number>.<dot-clause>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
e.g., 23.vector.cons.stdcxx-123.cpp
FWIW, I see no reason not to allow it since it provides
additional useful detail.
Martin
Mark Brown wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:56:30 -0600
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: regression test suite naming convention
If we constrain ourselves to the proposed options, my vote is for Option
2. The reason for this vote is because it allows us to more easily
determine what regression tests need to be run for a particular change.
If we don't constrain ourselves to the proposed options, I wish to put
forward an additional option.
Option 3:
Put all regression tests in tests/regress/, using the following
naming convention:
tests/regress/<section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
This option would allow us to quickly locate all regression tests, and
identify which section each regression test applies to without
consulting Jira.
I also think this option is better than the one I suggested. I suppose the file
name could include even more specific detail than just the section number such
as the name of the container or the member function, like vector.cons and so on.
-- Mark
--Andrew Black
Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm not hearing any yay's or nay's on the proposed convention
so how about a vote to practice our consensus building skills?
Everyone is encouraged to vote, including non-committers.
Option 1:
Put all regression tests in tests/regress/, naming each as
follows:
tests/regress/stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
Option 2:
Mix regression tests in with the rest based on the clause
in the standard and name each according to the following
formula:
tests/<section>/<section-number>.stdcxx-<issue-number>.cpp
Martin
