> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 6:30 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [RFC] commit-then-review vs review-then-commit >
[...] > So I would like to propose that we all follow a relaxed form > of the Review-Then-Commit policy, where "simple" or "obviously safe" > changes be allowed to go in under the Commit-Then-Review process. > I don't think it's necessary to precisely define what "simple" > or "obviously safe" means. It's a judgment call. > > Does this sound reasonable to everyone? Are we ready to have > a vote on this proposal? I'm agree and ready to vote. Farid.
