Martin Sebor wrote:
Our recent status report raised a question from one of the reviewers
about our commit policy, specifically about the following comment on
it on our project page:
Except where noted, all stdcxx committers follow the Review Then
Commit policy.
[...]
So I would like to propose that we all follow a relaxed form of
the Review-Then-Commit policy, where "simple" or "obviously safe"
changes be allowed to go in under the Commit-Then-Review process.
I don't think it's necessary to precisely define what "simple"
or "obviously safe" means. It's a judgment call.
Does this sound reasonable to everyone? Are we ready to have
a vote on this proposal?
I think it sounds reasonable. I'm ready for a vote.
Liviu
