Hi,
wurzel wrote:
>> i just read that v4.0 of stfax is in the works.
>> will this version also see major improvements for the answering
>> machine mode? i think on a scala from 1 to 10 with 10 meaning a very
>> good answering machine stfax currently only reaches about 3... theres
>> so much missing.
>
> On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, I'd rate it at 9.
Well...
> With different boxes for different people/uses, individual answering
> messages, Caller ID, saving .wav files etc, I can't see what is
> missing.
>
> Can you explain further what you think is missing?
At least working aswering machine and caller ID functionalities (for
some of us) and better user support...
--
STFax Mailing List - http://www.active-net.co.uk/products/stfax
ML-Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP" or "LONGINDEX"
ML-Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "DEL" in mail body
