> Hiya, on 30 May 99 23:07:26 +0200,
> Michael Merkel wrote about *"[stfax] v4.0 coming".*
>
> > i just read that v4.0 of stfax is in the works.
> > will this version also see major improvements for the answering
> > machine mode? i think on a scala from 1 to 10 with 10 meaning a very
> > good answering machine stfax currently only reaches about 3... theres
> > so much missing.
>
> On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, I'd rate it at 9.
>
> With different boxes for different people/uses, individual answering
> messages, Caller ID, saving .wav files etc, I can't see what is missing.
>
> Can you explain further what you think is missing?
e.g. spoken explanation texts (configurable) for every action you can do
from outside. if you try to forward a fax with the current version you really
don't know what you can do. it would be nice if stfax would have some
predefined (configurable) texts which tell you what to do.
also the scripting is in some terms basic. e.g. loops and sort of "gotos"
would be very nice to make better user handling.
(well, maybe 3 was a bit low... just to show there's something missing
here)
byebye...
--
Michael Merkel (MiMe@IRC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.t-online.de/home/Merkel.Michael/
---
Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net
--
STFax Mailing List - http://www.active-net.co.uk/products/stfax
ML-Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP" or "LONGINDEX"
ML-Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "DEL" in mail body
