> my own motivation for including 2 separate diagrams Fair enough, maybe after the Active/Passive Documentation is written it will shed more light on this.
-Ben Dewey -----Original Message----- From: Nick Hauenstein [mailto:ni...@quicklearn.com] Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 12:24 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: StockTrader Sample Documentation Updates "Is that just for alphabetical reasons?" Correct. The concerns you mention are my own motivation for including 2 separate diagrams. The first one is more a categorization of components, with a little logical ordering of the categories. I struggled with the categorization of the Configuration Service, as it's more an infrastructure service unrelated to the application logic. On the other hand, I didn't want to throw everything into its own category either, as that would defeat the purpose of categorization. With that diagram and text I'm 100% open to complete overhaul with whatever best helps in understanding, and at the same time reflects what is actually present in the application. - Nick -----Original Message----- From: Ben Dewey [mailto:ben.de...@26ny.com] Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 9:17 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: StockTrader Sample Documentation Updates Additionally, In the diagram and ToC you mention ActiveSTS before PassiveSTS. Is that just for alphabetical reasons? Seems to me that PassiveSTS would come before ActiveSTS. The rationale being that ActiveSTS wouldn't exist without a token from the Passive and that PassiveSTS needs to process the users creds before the ActiveSTS can process the token retrieved from the PassiveSTS. Same is also kind of true for the BS v. ConfigService Scenario. Sorry if this is too nit-picky, just something to think about. -Ben Dewey -----Original Message----- From: Nick Hauenstein [mailto:ni...@quicklearn.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 7:24 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: StockTrader Sample Documentation Updates Hello All, I took a stab at beginning documentation work for the StockTrader sample application. I am not a great scholar of claims-based security so if anyone would like to review and possibly edit/delete what is there, go right ahead. The main pages I touched were the following (and their respective children): http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STONEHENGE/Stonehenge+StockTrader+Sample+Application http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STONEHENGE/StockTrader+Client http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STONEHENGE/StockTrader+Business+Service http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STONEHENGE/StockTrader+Configuration+Service http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STONEHENGE/StockTrader+Order+Processor+Service http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STONEHENGE/StockTrader+Database If either of the main diagrams will require update, let me know and I can tweak them. Also, I'm holding off on creating the pages for the Active STS and Passive STS until everything is in working order and the precise requirements for each are known and well defined. - Nick