The lead paragraph is missing a couple of key words (inserted in blue). Should the last paragraph be more specific about the proposal that's out there for M3?
Thanks, Colleen -----Original Message----- From: Abu Obeida Bakhach [mailto:abu.obe...@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:16 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org; Kamaljit Bath; Kent Brown; Ben Dewey [ben.de...@26ny.com] (ben.de...@26ny.com) Subject: August Incubator Status Report We have a report due this Month. Please review the report below Stonehenge has been incubating since December 2008. Stonehenge includes (?) a set of example applications for Service Oriented Architecture that spans languages and platforms and demonstrates best practices and interoperability by using currently defined W3C and OASIS standard protocols. Since the last Stonehenge report in May, the Stonehenge community has concluded very extensive testing of the M2 milestone. M2 was released on July 10th with a rich feature set: - Added a StockTrader implementation based on the Sun/Oracle Metro stack fully exercising the WS-* features in Metro - Introduced support for WS-Trust, WS-Federation and WS-Security specs in all of the supported implementations of StockTrader. - Added claims based access using active and passive STS for .NET, Axis2 and Metro - A slick configuration UI that allows for dynamic configuration of backend services, selecting any service from each tack The community also has welcomed the addition of two new committers based on their hard work in M2, Pablo Cibraro and Nicholas Hauenstein. The community is currently reviewing strategic options for the project moving forward. Abu Obeida Bakhach Interoperability PM | Developer Platform Evangelism| Microsoft
