Oliver, Thanks for clearing that one up. I think there's a little extra work cut out for Google with this added security though. With these added function of Chrome, and possibly the expansion of the Chrome cummunity we will likely see more of this kind of references in the future. This would essentially mean that the Diagnostics pages would not be exactly acurate with the level of detection added in Chrome. Maybe there is something that can be done from the Chrome browsers point which can help the cause further.
Denis and Darren, Great that you two figured out the full extend of the problem. I had no doubt once I realized Denis had it nailed too. Did any of you give the Joomla coomunity a hint about a possible problem with this one, at least so that it can be investigated? Denis, By the next best thing, I had the protocol analysis in mind. It's a quick and dirty method of watching for data being send around. It's a little messy, I admit, and I completely missed the indicator - hence it's the next best thing as it requires quite some work to decode. Kent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message through the Google Groups "stopbadware" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stopbadware?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
