On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 03:35:01PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:46:22PM +0000, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote: > > Well, I don't consider having a commonly used stringification macro a > > namespace pollution. > > But that's exactly what's happened -- I chose a name without prefix, > #undef'd it at the end of the header, and relied on that it wouldn't > clash with anything. > > > It also makes sense to move it to defs.h before > > the mpers_type.h inclusion, for yet another option. > > Now that STRINGIFY/CONTENT macros are duplicated in multiple files, it's > not an option.
Do we need so many different stringify macros? Could we harmonize them somehow? -- ldv
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
