On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Aaron Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As long as you use the Stripes <s:checkbox> tag Stripes knows whether or
> not the boolean should be set. It stores the fields that are included in the
> <s:form> in the __fp hidden field. Because of this, when the checkbox
> parameter is entirely missing because it is not checked Stripes still knows
> and should act accordingly.
>
Well that doesn't seem correct to me. If the checkbox field is missing,
Stripes itself has no way of knowing the semantics I want - the best it can
do is what it appears to do, which is to give me a null. It is a little
weird, however, because an implication of this is that it'll never give me
an explicit "false". Again, that seems OK, because it would be presumptuous
of Stripes to assume that just because the value I code in the tag is
"true", that the value I want when it's unchecked is "false". (If there
were a way I could explicitly ask for that behavior, however, well that'd be
cool.)
--
Turtle, turtle, on the ground,
Pink and shiny, turn around.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Stripes-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
