On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Gregg Bolinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> So what's wrong with my suggestion to write a type converter? It's not
> exactly what they are normally used for because you wouldn't really be
> converting the type. But couldn't you check the value to see if it is null
> or not and simply return a Boolean.FALSE if it is null? I haven't tried
> this but in theory it sounds like it should work.
>
This is just my opinion, but I think it'd be architecturally backwards for
the Action to be in control of that interpretation. I'd like for the page to
be in control, or something else (don't know what) outside the Action, in
some configuration domain maybe.
To put it another way, I don't want the action to assume that I've got a
checkbox on my form.
--
Turtle, turtle, on the ground,
Pink and shiny, turn around.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Stripes-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
