> Note that Struts1.1 also require the TilesRequestProcessor to enable Tiles.
In practice, I find that if you only use a * single * Tiles definition file (no comma-delimited list), then the stock 1.1 ActionServlet seems to work just as well. This works with the Tiles example application as well as my own. Most of the code in the 1.1 ActionComponentServlet and TilesRequestServlet seem to overlap. Perhaps there's a way we could just use the processor in 1.1 and eliminate the servlet subclass? -T. Cedric Dumoulin wrote: > > By using tiles ActionComponentServlet , no Struts functionalities are lost. You > gain one : the ability to use Tiles definitions names as Struts forward. > Note that Struts1.1 also require the TilesRequestProcessor to enable Tiles. > > Cedric > > Vincent Stoessel wrote: > > > Just out of curiosity, what functionality is lost > > by using tiles' ActionComponentServlet ? > > Thanks > > > > Ricardo de Souza Moura wrote: > > > Can I use a plugIn to Tiles ? > > > I am not wanting to use the ActionComponentServlet, but I am wanting to > > > use the definitions-config param. > > > > > > There are some way ? > > > > > > Thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
