The first thing I noticed is that struts-el is missing from the download. I used the one I had from a nightly build in December and it didn't seem to cause conflicts.
I tried 1.2.0 in AppFuse and all tests pass! Nice work gents. I didn't even have to modify any files - my last Struts update was December 2, 2003. Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 1:39 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: 1.2.0 uploaded (Re: 1.2.0 is tagged and frozen) > > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > The release is built, but I have a couple of problems. > > > > 1) My ISP has gone flaky on me, and I haven't been able to > upload it > > to minotaur. They claim the problems should be fixed tomorrow, so > > hopefully I'll be able to upload it then. > > The release is now, finally, on minotaur. You can find it here: > > http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/ > > Before I send out an announcement message, I would really > appreciate it if someone could verify the integrity of the > files (e.g. by checking the sigs against the files > themselves), since I had so much trouble uploading them. > > <random-spout> > As a result of this debacle, I have a new-found intense > dislike of my ISP and a new-found respect for Linux. My ISP > supports only Windows, and has been unable to resolve my > problems in uploading large files using Windows, even though > it is abundantly clear that the problem is on their end. > > Eventually, I solved the problem by transferring the files to > a separate box that runs SuSE Linux (Thanks, Arron!), and > uploading the files from there using scp. My ISP does not > support Linux at all, yet scp on Linux recovered from the > network stalls that caused Windows to lock up. So it seems > that networking is more reliable, with my ISP, using > unsupported operating systems than using supported operating > systems... </random-spout> > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > > > > 2) Some of the exercise-taglibs tests are failing: > > 2a) <bean:include> fails because it is trying to include > welcome.html, > > but there is no such file. > > 2b) <html:img> fails because there are no images in the > > struts-examples web app at all. > > 2c) <html:messages> fails with a lot of nulls in the test table. > > > > It looks like all of these are probably issues with the test app > > itself, rather than the tags, so I'm not overly concerned, > and suspect > > we probably should go ahead with 1.2.0 anyway, especially > since we're > > not claiming it's a final release. > > > > Once I get the build uploaded, I'll ask other folks to take > it for a > > spin before sending out an announcement. > > > > Actually, with this new release strategy, where should the > > announcement message go, since it's not a Final release? The same > > lists, or a subset? Thoughts? > > > > -- > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > > Please hold off on all checkins until the release is done. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -- > > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
