On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, c tang wrote:
> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 06:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
> From: c tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: new feature
>
> Maybe I have not clearly stated my case.
> Let me give you an example, hope that will help.
>
> A Bean defines a method called findWhere which
> calls a ejb bean and return a Collection of
> objects. In current implementation, There is no way
> to use taglib to get hold of the collection of object
> in a jsp page other than usng ugly scriptlet. Does
> that go against what taglib is all about?
>
To accomplish your goal without any changes to the current code, you have
three choices:
* Change the name of the findWhere() method to getWhere() so that
it conforms to the JavaBeans design patterns.
* Add a BeanInfo class (see the JavaBeans specification for more
information) that tells the JDK that your "where" method's
property getter is named "findWhere" instead of "getWhere".
* Add property getter methods that conform to the standard JavaBeans
design patterns in addition to (or instead of) your findWhere method.
> ct
>
Craig
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -1.
> >
> > If someone wants to code their *beans* this way,
> > they should code/generate
> > a BeanInfo to go with it, IMHO.
> >
> > --
> > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
> > JavaNews: http://www.multitask.com.au/JavaNews
> > ----- Forwarded by dIon Gillard/Multitask
> > Consulting/AU on 11/10/2001 02:44 PM -----Re: new
> > feature
> >
> > -1
> >
> > Looking to call a method besides get*() runs
> > contrary to the JavaBean
> > specification. Struts should stick to the book.
> >
> > -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
> > -- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
> > -- Tel +1 716 737-3463
> > -- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/
> >
> >
> > c tang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I'd like a new feature being added to Nested
> > > References of bean tag. Currently it can read
> > from
> > > property with getter method. It would be nice if
> > it
> > > can read from a pure method too.
> > >
> > > For example,
> > > currently
> > > property="foo.bar"
> > > is translated into the equivalent the Java
> > expression:
> > > getFoo().getBar()
> > >
> > > I propose that if getBar() is not available,
> > > property="foo.bar"
> > > is translated into the equivalent the Java
> > expression:
> > > getFoo().bar()
> > >
> > > This is a feature in webobject, which allows
> > access to
> > > an object without have to define an attribute.
> > >
> > > ct
> > >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com
>
