Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Morten M. Christensen wrote:
>>Our situation is that we now need to output well-formed HTML (we will >>probably use XHTML), in order to do easy post processing in XSL/Java for >>various nice things like automated GUI testing (all extremely important >>and requires well-formed HTML / XHTML). > > All of the Struts tags in 1.0 generate well-formed HTML tags, in > accordance with the W3C HTML Specification. Unless you stick to a surprisingly forgiving definition of well-formed, this is not correct! I would recommend not to change or relax the definition of "well-formed" in order to cover up a problem (I even saw somebody on the net call this thing a design-flaw of struts). > For XHTML, some recent work has been done in the HEAD branch (and > therefore available through the nightly builds) to give you the option to > create well-formed XHTML instead. Simply do the following: > > <html:html xhtml="true"> > ... > </html:html> > > and the rendered tags will all be compatible with XML syntax, as XHTML > requires. Sounds good (but I have only tried the official release so far and I am a little worried about using a nightly build - should I be ?). And sorry for asking, but I am not totally familiar with your process/plans.... What does this mean exactly regarding: 1) Official struts support for XHTML ? 2) Degree of support for XHTML - identical in scope/quality/performance as old html? Does it mean that the users can safely use xhtml because it will be a natural part of struts v1.01 and will remain so in future released versions as well ? Thanks for you answer! Sincerely, Morten Christensen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
