Robert Leland wrote:

> +1 except I think we should lose the 'Struts' part of the class names. We
> know it's Struts, right? It's in a o.a.s package in the Struts jar file...
> ;-) So we'd have:
I agree we should remove 'Struts' and or 'Validator' from the names
> o.a.s.validator.Validator &
+1
> o.a.s.validator.ValidatorUtil
-1 The commons validator package already has a ValidatorUtil.
Looking at the methods they mainly store either message resources
or Validator resources in the request or context, so how about
Resource.java or splitting it up into 2 classes
Message.java & Resource.java ?

-Rob




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to