Sounds like the aye's have it: "modules" is the term. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted@;apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:14 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Terminology: modules versus sub-apps > > > +1 for modules. > > If the documentation refers to sub-apps anyplace today, that > would be a bug =:0) > > I did try using both, and sub-apps becomes clumsy. > > It is probably true that 1.1 is only supporting one possible > implementation of modules, but that's something we > can sort out later. (Sub modules versus nested modules, or whatever.) > > -Ted.y > > 10/16/2002 9:03:19 PM, Martin Cooper > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I think it's about time we all got on the same page as > regards whether these > >thingies are called modules or sub-apps. I believe we > decided on modules a > >while ago, but many of us are still referring to sub-apps. > The User Guide at > >this point has a mixture of both. > > > >It's going to be confusing to people if we aren't consistent > ourselves, so I > >think we need to make the decision here, and then all evangelise the > >selected terminology on both lists. > > > >So, are they modules, or are they sub-apps? > > > >My personal preference is modules, but I'm capable of typing > either when > >necessary. :-) > > > >-- > >Martin Cooper > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > >For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
