DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054 Rename "Application" components to "Module" ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-30 15:14 ------- I don't understand why the inheritance idea won't work. Why do you want to make an ApplicationConfig object from a ModuleConfig and vice versa? If you make ModuleConfig the parent then people subclassing ApplicationConfig can still pass that into methods that take a ModuleConfig object. If that works, you can just move the protected fields into ModuleConfig and people won't know the difference. I agree that we need to use interfaces but not for 1.1. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
