DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054 Rename "Application" components to "Module" ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-04 11:32 ------- Personally, I'm very impressed by the attention to detail here. But I just wanted to mention that Struts 1.1 is in BETA. We have betas so we can shake-out issues like this and fix them before we promote the codebase to a release. I really don't know how many people, if any, are referring to these objects directly. If they are, the problem would be very easy for them to fix by renaming their own references. At this level, we are working with other advanced developers and can expect them to do some of their own leg work. I agree that changing how the new config package works at this point would be rude, but I think simply renaming things doesn't have to be a big deal between beta releases. I would agree that this discussion would be on task if this were Struts 1.2 and we were renaming the component after the code was formally released. But I truly do not think any one outside the team will criticize us for just renaming this component now and moving forward. When it is just as easy for us to deprecate changes between betas, sure, lets go the extra yard and do the polite thing. But when it stops being simple, we should cut to the chase and play the beta card. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>