DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054

Rename "Application" components to "Module"





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-11-04 11:32 -------
Personally, I'm very impressed by the attention to detail here. But I just wanted to 
mention that 
Struts 1.1 is in BETA. We have betas so we can shake-out issues like this and fix them 
before we 
promote the codebase to a release. I really don't know how many people, if any, are 
referring to 
these objects directly. If they are, the problem would be very easy for them to fix by 
renaming 
their own references. At this level, we are working with other advanced developers and 
can expect 
them to do some of their own leg work. I agree that changing how the new config 
package works at this 
point would be rude, but I think simply renaming things doesn't have to be a big deal 
between beta 
releases. I would agree that this discussion would be on task if this were Struts 1.2 
and we were 
renaming the component after the code was formally released. But I truly do not think 
any one 
outside the team will criticize us for just renaming this component now and moving 
forward. When 
it is just as easy for us to deprecate changes between betas, sure, lets go the extra 
yard and do the 
polite thing. But when it stops being simple, we should cut to the chase and play the 
beta card.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to