On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:23:39 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Axis4Struts package names > > > > I guess even though some of the code will be run in Axis and some will be > run in Struts there's no real requirement that the classes have to be in > packages that reflect that. > > If the packages are to all live in org.apache.struts then maybe Mark's idea > is good: > > org.apache.struts.axis > > Adopting a "org.apache" name may seem presumptuous - but if the Struts > developers don't mind having this project use org.apache.struts.axis (or > org.apache.struts.anything...) then that's probably as good as anything. > I thought the convention for SF-based Java projects was net.sf.<package> or something like that? If the code is later migrated into Struts and/or Axis, package names changes are pretty trivial, and shouldn't require fixing anything more than some import statements. > Comments? Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
