Ted Husted said: > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > Splitting Tiles and Validator is a little tougher if we go for the > > previously popular idea of melding all the custom request processor > > subclasses into a single one (since we don't have multiple inheritance and > > don't have a decomposition solution yet - which is at least partly my > > fault). > > Unless someone can show me how Tiles can be used without JSP, I would be > tend to be -1 on integrating Tiles with the inner core, or making any > other product changes that imply a specific presentation technology.
Ted, i'd love to hear your thoughts on this: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TilesTool it's been offered as a contribution to the Velocity-Tools project. i'm inclined to take it, but since i've never used Tiles (yet), i'm soliciting other's opinions/evaluations. i am a little concerned that some of the Tiles classes use things in the org.apache.struts.taglib.tiles package (e.g. ComponentConstants). once the struts taglibs are separated from the core, i don't want to keep a dependency on them. ... > I'd be very much in favor of integrating something like Tiles as part > of the request processor, so long as it is accessible to non-JSP > technologies. But I'm not sure if we have that now. agreed. Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
