Paul
Joe Germuska wrote:
Right now, if you accidentally enter a bogus form name in the html:javascript tag, it omits the wrapping <script> tags, but prints all the javascript anyway.
This doesn't seem right, but for some reason I have a feeling that the solutions I'm thinking of are a bit contentious, so rather than just change it, I thought I'd test the waters.
My first thought was to print an HTML comment, something like <!-- No form 'formName' found in 'formSet' -->
But I think some people might not like that. Alternatives include throwing a JSPException; logging a warning and returning quietly, or doing something more in-your-face that would actually be visible, as opposed to in a comment. Part of me really likes the last because this is something that should only ever happen during development time, and the current spew of javascript is certainly in-your-face, but...
Anyway, I don't really have a strong feeling about it. If no one weighs in, I'll probably stick with the comment, but I'll take any other direction.
Hopefully the direction will come soon, though, because I'm also going to fix the tag class to escape error messages that contain quote-characters, and I'd just as soon commit 'em both at once.
Joe
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
