Quoting Paul Sundling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I originally thought it said <html:image> instead of <html:img> . I noticed that <html:image> does not have height and width. When I look at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for <input type="image"..., but from testing I know that height and width work for that tag in both mozilla and IE. Would it be worth adding height and width to the <html:image> tag?
Just as a matter of note, height and width should work with Netscape 4+ & IE 4+
for <input type="image">. Looks like your pocket reference skimped on the
details :)
In terms of adding the two attributes to the <html:image> tag, I personally think it would make a useful addition...
"height" and "width" are not valid attributes of the "input" tag: see http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.4
Joe
--
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining."
-- Jef Raskin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
