> > s would really decrease render time as, when rendered as > > xhtml, the browser looks for a closing tag and cant find it > > Hmm, maybe. But Struts is for rendering html, and I'm pretty sure xhtml > and html aren't entirely compatible... (how does your IE3.0 react on > "<br/>" ?) > > have a read at: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#guidelines It talks about being compatible with older versions of html
Also, why would struts want to be compatible only with html when we are in the process of migrating to a new standard (talking abt xhtml now)??? I think projects like struts should at least have support for xhtml. It currently does only supply xml:lang in <html>.. but that cant be called 'compliance' or even 'support' xhtml is very like html (4.0) but with compliancy towards xml.. so by only adding those ' />' to every opening tag and by taking a glance at validator.w3.org now and then, struts could support xhtml. grtz Wim Fournier > tomK > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
