> > Also, why would struts want to be compatible only with html > > when we are in the > > process of migrating to a new standard (talking abt xhtml now)??? > > "migrating to a new standard" ? xhtml is a "reformulation" of html, not > a replacement... Maybe I got this whole xhtml concept wrong, but I know > for sure that Cocoon takes xhtml, and the very last step before sending > everything to the browser is converting it to html. This would have a > reason, I would think. > I'll figure that out.. I believe xhtml is supported by every browser that supports html, if you stick at those rules w3c gives
> > I think projects like struts should at least have support for xhtml. > > It currently does only supply xml:lang in <html>.. but that > > cant be called 'compliance' or even 'support' > > > > xhtml is very like html (4.0) but with compliancy towards > > xml.. so by only adding > > those ' />' to every opening tag and by taking a glance at > > validator.w3.org > > now and then, struts could support xhtml. > > Start sending in patches, as long as everything stays backward > compatible (including older browsers), you shouldn't have too much > trouble getting them in IMHO. > Have a look ;o) i tried it on netscape 3 (sillydog.org/narchive) www.geeks.nl/~wim/netscape3.bmp sorry for the bmp.. didnt manage to get n3 working on linux ;o) > tomK > > -- grtz Wim Fournier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
