Actually we have it the other way around... we are using <jsp:include> not <@ include%>
dave -----Original Message----- From: Dave J Dandeneau Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:56 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: JSP size optimizations We are using the <%@ include file="" %> tag and not <jsp:include ...><param></param></jsp:include>. dave -----Original Message----- From: Alex Paransky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:17 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Cc: Nilesh R Gohel Subject: RE: JSP size optimizations Hopefully, you are using the dynamic include and not the static include, right? -AP_ -----Original Message----- From: Dave J Dandeneau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:30 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Cc: Nilesh R Gohel Subject: JSP size optimizations We are currently getting "Branch too large" exceptions on some of our larger JSPs. We have tried to include as much as we can from other JSPs to reduce the method size, but we are still exceeding the 64K limit. On one of the JSPs in particular we have three different date inputs which I believe is causing the huge method sizes. Are there any taglibs that I can use that will reduce the method size? Can I include the "<html:option>" elements even though they are part of a form tag? Are there any other optimizations that we can use? Thanks, dave -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>