Yup I read it... I also read an article on it at http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-11-2002/jw-1129-jsf.html
But, my question is, how long before it will be ready for use? PS: It looks cool! Regards, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: edgar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:22 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces? The JSF Spec is a MUST READ for serious web application developers. There is a lot of stuff going on and it will seriously effect the way you develop and think about web applications. http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=127 Edgar -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 10:03 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces? >>"Have you got an alternative suggestion for how to build complicated >>UIs for a web browser *without* using client side JavaScript?" Flash! ;-) btw: I havent had time to look at JSF yet. Glad to hear its not just for rendering HTML, but is it applicable to JSP based rendering approaches only, or more generic than that? -----Original Message----- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 09:18 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces? On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Jonathan Holloway wrote: > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:28:39 -0000 > From: Jonathan Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Complicated Web Interfaces? > > Ok in principle then it seems fine it's just I don't like the fact > that a scripting language whether client or server side can be > embedded in the presentation logic, it still seems like a bit of a > workaround. Have you got an alternative suggestion for how to build complicated UIs for a web browser *without* using client side JavaScript? > I've wondered about whether the Model2X approach and the Model 2 > approach for some while now and it seems like the latter doesn't > seperate the concerns as much as Model 2X. The only thing that makes > me doubt this is the fact that Sun and yourself have gone this way via > the Model 2 approach with Java Server Faces rather than the Model 2 > approach. Is there any particular reason why this method is preferred > over the Model 2X approach? > You'll have to point me at a definition of what you mean by "Model 2X" -- I've seen the term bandied about, but don't know of any formal description. Regarding JavaServer Faces in particular, it is *not* a goal of JSF to be focused purely on HTML as the markup language. There will be a set of common components included, but no requirement that HTML be the only way they are rendered. I fully expect to see JSF implementations using all sorts of other technologies as well. > Jon. > Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
